• Welcome to ROFLMAO.com—the ultimate destination for unfiltered discussions and endless entertainment! Whether it’s movies, TV, music, games, or whatever’s on your mind, this is your space to connect and share. Be funny. Be serious. Be You. Don’t just watch the conversation—join it now and be heard!

music Which is Better: The Original or The Cover?

For threads introducing new music releases, discoveries, or recommendations.
Joined
Aug 28, 2024
Messages
2,882
Impact
688
LOL Coins
Ṩ3,174
Signature Pro
A Simple Signature
Title Glow
Italify Name
Which is better: The original or the cover? Pick a song and a cover you've head, post both, and let the community decide between the two.

Original: Post Malone feat. 21 Savage - Rockstar


Cover: Andy Cizek & Nik Nocturnal - Rockstar


I'm leaning toward the Andy Cizek cover because the Post Malone song got played out when it first dropped. It also gets me pumped in the gym to lift heavy and to go hard!
 
I do not listen to cover songs and I do not want to see some random people ruin the original song or even do it better and make me feel bad about the artist.
 
I think the Post Malone version is better. Here's my challenge:

Original: Whitney Houston - I Have Nothing

Cover: Gabriel Henrique - I Have Nothing (Whitney Houston)
 
Original: Whitney Houston - I Have Nothing
Cover: Gabriel Henrique - I Have Nothing (Whitney Houston)
This is a tough one as I like them both. However, I think I'll have to give it to Whitney because of one main thing: Audio engineering.

She was able to capture that sound without the technology most likely involved in Gabriel's production.

One tell is that Whitney was most likely in a soundproof studio, while he is in an open environment. There's no way Gabriel didn't have to "clean it up" and also add tuning that probably wasn't available during Whitney's era.
 
Back
Top