Welcome to ROFLMAO.com—the ultimate destination for unfiltered discussions and endless entertainment! Whether it’s movies, TV, music, games, or whatever’s on your mind, this is your space to connect and share. Be funny. Be serious. Be You. Don’t just watch the conversation—join it now and be heard!

Reply to thread

Message

I would assume that it's a cost thing.

Many studios invest in making their movies the best, so they need A-listers to be leads. If an A-lister learns through method acting, it could expose them to dangers that they're not accustomed to, especially without the security details they would typically have.

That said, if an A-lister was lost during method acting, whose fault would it be? Could the studio be at risk of a lawsuit? Also, actors, and other very rich people, have insurance policies that cost quite a pretty penny. I would suspect that their policies are void if they put themselves into any risky situation.

I think it comes down to the safety of the actor, to ensure they have that career to bring in the audience, and money.

[USER=199]@Starmix25[/USER] also pointed out the dangers of method acting too. They are not professionals, for the most part, at anything except acting. They should leave the stunts up to the pros.

<blockquote data-quote="Harsh World" data-source="post: 15041" data-attributes="member: 8">I would assume that it&#039;s a cost thing.Many studios invest in making their movies the best, so they need A-listers to be leads. If an A-lister learns through method acting, it could expose them to dangers that they&#039;re not accustomed to, especially without the security details they would typically have.That said, if an A-lister was lost during method acting, whose fault would it be? Could the studio be at risk of a lawsuit? Also, actors, and other very rich people, have insurance policies that cost quite a pretty penny. I would suspect that their policies are void if they put themselves into any risky situation.I think it comes down to the safety of the actor, to ensure they have that career to bring in the audience, and money.[USER=199]@Starmix25[/USER] also pointed out the dangers of method acting too. They are not professionals, for the most part, at anything except acting. They should leave the stunts up to the pros.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Harsh World, post: 15041, member: 8"] I would assume that it's a cost thing. Many studios invest in making their movies the best, so they need A-listers to be leads. If an A-lister learns through method acting, it could expose them to dangers that they're not accustomed to, especially without the security details they would typically have. That said, if an A-lister was lost during method acting, whose fault would it be? Could the studio be at risk of a lawsuit? Also, actors, and other very rich people, have insurance policies that cost quite a pretty penny. I would suspect that their policies are void if they put themselves into any risky situation. I think it comes down to the safety of the actor, to ensure they have that career to bring in the audience, and money. [USER=199]@Starmix25[/USER] also pointed out the dangers of method acting too. They are not professionals, for the most part, at anything except acting. They should leave the stunts up to the pros. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Reply to thread

ROFLMAO

Quick Access

ROFLMAO

Stay Connected