• Welcome to ROFLMAO.com—the ultimate destination for unfiltered discussions and endless entertainment! Whether it’s movies, TV, music, games, or whatever’s on your mind, this is your space to connect and share. Be funny. Be serious. Be You. Don’t just watch the conversation—join it now and be heard!

discuss DOGE Targeting Low Income Housing

This thread covers all aspects of ideologies, including beliefs, principles, traditions, policies, and their influence on society and culture.
Joined
Dec 24, 2024
Messages
615
Impact
59
LOL Coins
𝕷2,224
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mar...1&cvid=74538e2a88b042fb98b05833402e68ce&ei=14

Amid record unaffordability, the Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E), a Musk-backed initiative inside the White House, directed the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to cut millions in federal housing contracts. The funding cuts have shut down projects in over 1,000 communities, hitting programs designed to address homelessness, disaster recovery, and community development. Housing advocates are calling it an attack on low-income families, but D.O.G.E has not backed down.
Look, I got no problem with cutting programs, if the economy will provide jobs to replace the programs. But actually, Trump and Musk are also putting a chainsaw to the economy, so good luck with that, :D
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mar...1&cvid=74538e2a88b042fb98b05833402e68ce&ei=14


Look, I got no problem with cutting programs, if the economy will provide jobs to replace the programs. But actually, Trump and Musk are also putting a chainsaw to the economy, so good luck with that, :D
You are right. The reason people rely on this kind of support from the government is lack of good jobs. If jobs that pay living wages can be provided, there won't be any problem. My real concern with the approach they use is that it is going to increase the level of inequality in the US.
 
Without reading the news, I'm sure this has nothing to do with cutting off illegal immigrants from housing and letting American citizens get those spots.

I don't think Democrats will survive midterm elections (making Trump a lame Duck) and then there's a good chance of losing the presidency (for the Republicans) in 2028.

He'll pick up more seats and JD Vance will win. I will bet on both.
 
Cutting housing for the poor will mean more homelessness. It will make America look even worse.

I feel like they're smart enough not to do that. My question - before this administration, was HUD providing programs for undocumented aliens? If so, I think cutting those programs is a good idea because they need to be deported.

We have way too many homeless Americans. Quit ignoring them and helping those who are not Americans.
 
I'm always against welfare unless necessary.
I'm mixed on it.

My grandmother got LINK card when she was alive. About $100 a month. But the lazy mom and dad claiming anxiety gets $1,000 a month.

I see too many young people doing nothing and collecting and too many old people working when they should be retired.

That IMO is disgusting.
 
was HUD providing programs for undocumented aliens?
I can only assume so if FEMA was spending $152/night~ on rooms up in NYC...
Garcia said the city has never paid luxury rates. The vast majority are outside Manhattan, and the government has paid on average $152 a night for rooms, according to a 2024 city comptroller report. In comparison, 5-star hotels in Manhattan for the coming weekend run from $400 a night to well over $1,000.

undocumented aliens
Not a warning (here), but an everyday use warning: Stop using this politically correct term to describe them. They are illegal aliens. I don't care how many times I'm corrected for stating that they are illegal aliens. I will still refer to them as such for illegal entry into the United States. By using "undocumented", you are downplaying the severity of illegal immigration in this country and playing into their hand that they are just asylum seekers here to do no wrong, which for the most part they are, but there is still a process to follow.

1911. 8 U.S.C. 1325 -- Unlawful Entry, Failure To Depart, Fleeing Immigration Checkpoints, Marriage Fraud, Commercial Enterprise Fraud

Section 1325 sets forth criminal offenses
relating to (1) improper entry into the United States by an alien, (2) entry into marriage for the purpose of evading immigration laws, and (3) establishing a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading immigration laws. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) amended 8 U.S.C. § 1325 to provide that an alien apprehended while entering or attempting to enter the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty.
Source: https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm...wful-entry-failure-depart-fleeing-immigration

We have way too many homeless Americans. Quit ignoring them and helping those who are not Americans.
Totally agree. Many homeless veterans could be flown around to various places to get proper housing, education, and rehabilitation.

The total number of Veterans who experienced homelessness was 32,882 – a decrease 7.5% over January 2023. This is the fewest number of Veterans counted since HUD first began reporting on Veteran homelessness in the PIT Count in 2019.
Source: https://www.va.gov/homeless/pit_count.asp

But NYC can put up 54,000? Apart from my belief, that there are more distressed Veterans than 32,882, make this make sense to me.
Currently, in addition to roughly 54,000 people in the DHS homeless shelter system who resided in New York City prior to July 2022, there are more than 65,000 asylum seekers in emergency shelters.

The Comptroller’s Office estimates that 77 percent of asylum seekers are sheltered in hotels, with the City leasing approximately 15,750 rooms across 157 hotels in New York City. This represents approximately 11.5 percent of the overall hotel inventory of 136,000 rooms in New York City.
Source: https://comptroller.nyc.gov/reports...service-costs-for-shelter-for-asylum-seekers/

And, this is only looking at New York City. This is beyond outrageous when you make a comparison across the States.

I'm always against welfare unless necessary.
Some welfare is fine to help people get back on their feet. But, there needs to be stipulations such as drug testing to even volunteer work if you cannot find a suitable job. You shouldn't just be filing that you applied to 3 jobs per week to collect unemployment; I'm sure you can fit 10 community-service hours in there to, one, not only help your community, but two, strengthen your resume and job skills.

The problem is that government always makes it worse by making people dependent on the welfare system. One example of this is that mothers are incentivized not to marry because they can get assistance if they are unmarried. When you make laws like this, you are sending a message that people aren't responsible for their actions and that the government will always be there to help.
 
ESL Teachers in Asia
Sadly, this is the gig if you want to "make it" as a foreigner over time. It gives you enough to get off your feet and do something else, but I do see often too many relying on it without a plan to stop or focus elsewhere, where I know their real passion is.

I wouldn't be where I am without this entry-level type of work.
 
DOGE gets it wrong this time. Targeting low income families is really absurd. Why would they do that? The government is supposed to support the low income earners and not add to their problems. This move is going to create a lot of disaster and homelessness if it wasn't stopped. Musk needs to put an end to this madness.
 
Back
Top